The Sexist Texas CPS Tries to Brainwash Again

Back in April, 2008 when the Texas Child Protective Service (CPS) was basking in the early glow of incompetence, the agency decided it had to remove all girls from the Fundamentalist Church of the Latter Day Saints (FLDS) ranch near Eldorado. The initial plan was to leave the boys unprotected because they were unimportant or perhaps would be victims in the anticipated shootout.

When someone pointed out the bigotry implicit in that action, the CPS then started grabbing the boys as well. However, the CPS public relations statements made it very clear that the position was that the girls were future victims, but the boys were future victimizers.

Now while the debacle dust is settling, the gender feminists of the CPS strike again. There is another issue; of course, but the cover is what is claimed to be good for the girls. The latest attempt is that the young girls are supposed to attend CPS run “marriage schools.”

There sixty‑three children, all girls, who will be required to attend classes in San Angelo, Texas. CPS claims that the classes are for girls who have been sexually abused or who are at risk of sexual abuse.

This is a last chance at brainwashing. If successful, the young girls can be converted into victims.

The persons conducting the classes are private parties. This is more pork flowing from the CPS. Competent and professional therapists do not bring up the issue of sexual abuse. Only if a client makes the claim is the discussion warranted.

During the recovered memory craze, some therapists delighted in claiming that their clients were sexually abused and that was the root of all their problems. If the client could not remember the abuse, the therapist insisted the client had to remember harder.

Social workers and clinical psychologists beholding to prosecutors have been very adept at guiding young children into false statements of sexual abuse. Victims and perpetrators alike were created by the process.

It is notable that boys are not considered at risk. But, the CPS has always considered the males to be future perpetrators. If that were stopped, neither law enforcement nor social service agencies would have any limelight in future cases.

Of course, the presumption in law enforcement and the judiciary that females are weak and vulnerable is always at play. The reality is that girls are more robust than boys. And, at least from the age of puberty, females generally have a lead in intellectual capability and judgement.

CPS published some interesting data early in the witch hunt.

Table A – Sex Ratios per Age Group
Age Range	Sex Ratio*
0 to 2 years	108.2
3 to 5 years	115.2
6 to 9 years	92.6
10 to 13 years	82.3
14 to 17 years	55.5

The age and sex data of the captive children was published by CPS. Table A shows the sex ratios for the age groups of the captive children. In the United States, the secondary sex ratio, or sex ratio at birth is 105. This ratio decreases for each age cohort as the cohort ages. With the age twenty‑nine cohort, the ration is about 100. The table indicates a more dramatic drop.

Note that the sample size is very small so ultimately, the numbers may be natural. But, this deserves a look since if there is a drop in the sex ratio for each age cohort similar to the that in Table A there could be health issues that must be addressed. But, the CPS is not concerned about boy’s health.

The table does not include the disputed girls. These are girls that the CPS claimed were underage, but were actually in their twenties. We must also consider that CPS was incompetent generally with their claims of underage pregnancies.

It should be clear that the main reasons for making the young girls attend these indoctrination classes are: to have another chance at coercing the girls into victims, and to help with the continuing CYA activities of the Texas authorities.

* Sex ratio is the number of boys per 100 girls.